Let us share some of our cases of Interpol interaction
Each case is individual and unique, but we always work together with our clients and local lawyers to achieve the desired result.
We have experience in challenging Interpol Red Notice, preventive requests to block a possible publication, as well as checking for Interpol Red Notices or Diffusion.
Our client was facing persecution through INTERPOL channels. We presented a strong case that maintaining the INTERPOL Red Notice was unjustified and violated our client's rights as a refugee.
Our clients are being prosecuted by some countries through INTERPOL channels for allegations of activity in AirBitClub schemes. Our team took proactive measures by submitting a preemptive request to the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF)
The Applicant was accused of giving bribes to officials from 2013 until 2015. and became the subject of INTERPOL Red Notice. WIth the help of our lawyers, the Commission decided to delete the INTERPOL notice
Our client faced the imminent threat of extradition arrest, prompting a need for urgent and strategic legal intervention. This case has been a powerful example of how proactive and transparent defense strategies can significantly influence the outcome of extradition cases.
The Applicant was accused of fraudulent misappropriation of funds from the Russian budget and was put on the international wanted list in 2020. Interpol Law Firm requested the deletion of the data concerning the Applicant contending, in essence, that there is a lack of clarity regarding the purpose of processing the data.
The client was a subject of a diffusion circulated by Ukraine in 2010 for “misappropriation or embezzlement of somebody else’s property. The applicant pointed out that the case was not of interest for the purposes of international police cooperation due to the small amount of damages.
The Applicant is a national of Ukraine and Russia. They were a subject of Interpol’s diffusion circulated on 19 November 2020 by Russia for “use of violence against a public official”. Therefore, the Commission concluded that the data challenged in this regard did not comply with Article 3 of INTERPOL’s Constitution.
Mr. S. is a famous Ukrainian businessman, who was charged on rather imaginative and illegal grounds with embezzlement of public funds in 2017. In August 2018 a Red Notice regarding the Client was published by Interpol. In October 2019 the Commission held that the notice regarding our Client no longer meets the conditions for publishing a notice and according to Article 81 §3 (c) of the Rules, the notice shall be canceled.
In April 2020 Interpol issued a Blue Notice regarding the Client, who was at the time in Cyprus. Our lawyers requested the deletion of the data concerning the Client contending the criminal prosecution at the national level has not met the standards and principles of human rights.
On 2021, while crossing the German-Danish border, Client was stopped by Danish border police and, after checking his documents, detained, saying that he was wanted by Interpol (a request from the Republic of Turkey) based on convicted 6 years for robbery.
Important information for our clients
- Non Extradition Countries
- Can You Fly if You Have a Warrant in 2023?
- Who Is the Most Wanted Person in The World?
- Interpol Blue Notice
- How do I know if I am wanted by Interpol?
- How Can I Join INTERPOL?
- Interpol Red Notice
- Interpol Black Notice
- Interpol Yellow Notices
- Can You Get Arrested at the Airport?
