Updated on
Sep, 27 2024
Kendall Coffey
Researched by

Red Notice Deletion at the request of the country source of data

The Facts

On 2021, while crossing the German-Danish border, Client was stopped by Danish border police and, after checking his documents, detained, saying that he was wanted by Interpol (a request from the Republic of Turkey) based on convicted 6 years for robbery.

The applicant’s arguments

Applicant was arguing about violation of Art.2 of INTERPOL’s Constitution / Articles 3 and 6 of the ECHR / Articles 5 and 10 of the UDHR in his case.

Removing red notice

Extradition refus

On 2021, the Danish Prosecutor General made a recommendation not to extradite Client to the Turkish authoritie, since it cannot be ruled out with reasonable certainty that Client, if extradited to the Turkish authoritie, risks being subjected to torture or other inhuman or other inhuman or cruel treatment, degrading treatment in violation of Article 3 of the ECHR, see section 6 (1) of the Extradition Act 2.

Based on the recommendations of the Attorney General, on April 8, 2021, Nicobing court decided to refuse to extradite Ruslan Lebid at the request of the Turkish side.


The Results

After submitting a complaint to the Commission, the country of source of the data independently deleted the data on the client.

Kendall Coffey
Kendall Coffey
I have a long standing passion for criminal law, human rights issues, and politics, all of which are relevant to the practice of Interpol Red Notice defense. While few attorneys have experience with successfully challenging Red Notices, I do.
Interpollawfirm
whatsup Viber Telegram E-mail
Book a call
Your message is send!